Yugoslavia
was part of the Little Entente organized by France. Although its foreign policy
was pro-Allied it did not declare war on Germany in 1939. The defeat of France
in 1940 caught the Yugoslav leaders by surprise and forced them to adopt a pro
Axis policy. This change however was opposed by a group of military officers
and in March 1941 a coup replaced the regent Prince Paul
with General Dušan
Simović. This maneuver (thought to be organized by the British) infuriated
Hitler and he ordered that the country was to be destroyed as a political
entity. In April Yugoslav troops were quickly overrun by German forces and a
period of occupation and internal strife began.
During the occupation
the old antagonisms between ethnicities (Serbs vs Croats) and political
movements (Right vs Left) resurfaced and led to a multisided civil war. The
Chetniks of General
Mihailović fought the Communist Partisans of Marshall Tito and both
attacked the collaborationist government of Milan Nedic, the
German and Italian occupation troops and the Croat forces of Ante Pavelić.
All sides
took to heart the motto ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend’. This meant that
at times some resistance group would make a deal with the occupation
authorities and agree to leave them alone so both could attack another group.
The results of this widespread conflict were mass destruction of property and
loss of lives as each group attacked the villages that supported their enemies.
During the
period 1941-44 the Germans mounted major operations against the resistance
movements but they could not destroy them. In their war against the Chetniks
and the Partisans however they took advantage of signals intelligence. The
resistance groups used codes that could not withstand a serious cryptanalytic
attack and their cipher clerks made many mistakes that facilitated solution. By
reading the traffic of Tito and Mihailović
the Germans could build up the OOB of their organizations, identify important
personalities and anticipate enemy operations.
At the same time the British also used cryptanalysis in order to monitor
the internal Yugoslav situation and decide which resistance group they should
give supplies to. Their ability to decode the Enigma cipher machine meant that
they could use German military messages to see if the information coming from
the Chetniks and the Partisans was corroborated by official German reports.
They also read Chetnik and Partisan messages including the clandestine traffic
between Moscow and Tito (this program was called ISCOT).
German
effort
According to
post war interrogations of Army personnel and the archives of the Army’s signal intelligence agency Partisan and Chetnik communications
were intercepted and decoded both by forward units in the Balkans and by the
central department in Berlin.KONA 4 (Kommandeur der Nachrichtenaufklärung - Signals Intelligence Regiment) had fixed and mobile units intercepting and decoding traffic from the Balkans and the Middle East. Specifically British, French, Turkish, Bulgarian and resistance movements communications. Yugoslav communications were also worked on by small detachment under Lieutenant Wollny (Nachrichten Aufklärung Zug ‘W’) based in Belgrade.
Report of KONA
4 for 2nd quarter 1944:
The few systems that resisted attack were
handled by the Balkan department (Referat 6) of OKH/Inspectorate 7/VI headed by councilor
Bailovic. In the period
1943-44 the department was also able to solve the codes used by Mihailović for his communications with the
Yugoslav government in Exile and some the traffic of British liaison officers
in Yugoslavia and Greece.
Mihailović traffic
Most of the Mihailović traffic was single and double columnar
transposition with the same key being used for both cages. The keyword was
taken from a novel. This traffic was solved thanks to the stereotyped beginnings
and endings of the reports (many messages ended with the signature ‘GENERAL
DRAZA MIHAJLOVIC’) or operator mistakes and it was possible, in some cases, to
retrieve the book that was used as a key source. According to Army cryptanalyst
Herzfeld (assigned to the central department at that time) 70% of the messages
were solved. The success rates given by Reudelsdorff (a member of the
Wollny unit) were 95% for simple transposition and 55% for double
transposition.
The reports
of KONA 4 show that double transposition became the main system in late 1942
and solution required the analysis of a large volume of traffic.
1st quarter
’44: 4.500 messages.
2nd quarter
’44: 4.400 messages.
3rd quarter
’44: 2.500 messages4th quarter ’44: 776 messages and 99 advance reports issued (S-Meldungen/Sofortmeldungen).
The traffic allowed the Germans to
create a card index of Chetnik personalities and follow the movement of their
units in Yugoslavia. Some of the messages were particularly noteworthy since
they showed that Mihailović greatly distrusted his British liaison officers and
suspected them of colluding with Tito.
Special traffic Mihailovic-Yugoslav government in Exile
Tito traffic
Special traffic Mihailovic-Yugoslav government in Exile
After Yugoslavia was occupied by Axis forces, in April 1941, King Peter
II and many politicians and government ministers were able to escape abroad and
they constituted the Yugoslav government in Exile. Their official representative in the
country and head of the resistance movement was General Draža
Mihailović.
Mihailović and the Yugoslav government in Exile kept in contact through
the use of enciphered radio-messages. These
communications were investigated by the
German codebreakers and in May 1943 they were able to solve the first messages
of the special traffic (sonderverkehr)
between Mihailović and the London based government. The cryptosystem used was double
transposition and the solution was difficult and required time consuming work
by the personnel of Referat 6.
Report of Referat 6 - May 1943:
The special
traffic to London (and later Cairo) continued to be solved till January 1945. The
monthly average for the period 1943-44 was about 50 messages with the maximum
achieved in June ’44 at 113 messages.
Tito traffic
The traffic
of Tito’s units was enciphered with a numerical monoalphabetic cipher
consisting of a one or two digit number substituted for each letter. A short
repeating additive sometimes based on a key-word was used for superencipherment.
These systems
offered limited security and could not secure the large volume of traffic from
Partisan units. The reports of KONA 4 show that in 1943 this traffic was easily
solved and valuable information was gained on the organization and operations of
the Tito movement.
In 1944 Partisans
traffic continued to be read successfully till May ’44 when the Partisans
started using non-repeating additive sequences for enciphering their code (this
system was called ‘Novo Sifra’). For a while the new system proved secure but
regional commands obviously found it cumbersome and reverted to old insecure
systems. Thus the Germans could read a lot of Partisan traffic even after mid
’44.
3rd quarter
’44: 12.500 messages.
The
statistics for KONA 4 are the following:
1st quarter
’44: 7.600 messages.
2nd quarter
’44: 14.000 messages.
4th quarter
’44: 10.024 messages.
The most
important messages were those from Tito’s HQ to the regional commands in
Croatia, Montenegro, East Bosnia, Dalmatia and Slavonia. The intercepted
messages allowed the Germans to identify the Partisan personalities, the OOB of
their units and anticipate enemy operations. They also showed that Tito had an
extensive espionage network throughout the country.
Traffic
Tito-Moscow
Marshall Tito had close relations with the Soviet Union and during the
war he was in constant contact with Moscow through a radio link. This traffic
obviously became a target for the Germans and they investigated it in 1944
without finding a theoretical solution.
Report of March 1944:
Some messages
however were read thanks to captured material. In May ’44 the Germans tried to
capture Tito during operation ‘Knight’s
Move’(Operation Rösselsprung). Although they did not succeed in their
primary objective they were able to gather cipher material from his abandoned
headquarters. This material was used to solve some of the Moscow traffic in
June ’44:
It should be
noted that other German agencies might have also investigated the foreign
traffic of the Tito movement. For example the codebreaking department of the
German Foreign Ministry – Pers Z solved Comintern traffic during the war.
Apart from
cryptanalysis the Germans had other ways to gain information. Messages between
Tito and Moscow were sent by radio and by courier. During the war some of these
couriers fell into German hands with the result that Tito’s political maneuvers
could be followed. In 1943 they were surprised to learn that Moscow had ordered
him to assist the German forces in case of Allied invasion of the Adriatic
coast! The British authorities kept in contact with Tito and Mihailović through liaison officers sent by the intelligence services SIS and SOE. These small teams transmitted traffic by radio to their controlling stations in Cairo, Egypt and Bari, Italy. The cryptosystems used were double transposition and the War Office Cypher, enciphered with one time pads.
Some of the encoded
radio traffic of British officers in the Balkans was exploited by the Germans. They
were able to read messages both through captured material and by cryptanalysis.
The reports of KONA 4 show that some cipher material was captured in the field
and messages read. For example in 1943:
In 1944 the
investigation of the cipher material recovered from Tito’s HQ showed that the
British officers had a copy of the War
Office Cypher, used with one time pads, plus double transposition keys.
Field units had to rely on captured material in order to read British agents transmission but this
was not necessarily true of the central department. The reports of Inspectorate
7/VI show that this traffic (special traffic to Cairo with indicator GESH) was
first solved in June by Referats 6 and 12:
Traffic
continued to be read till November 1944 but it seems this was mostly from the
team assigned to the headquarters of General Mihailović and from the liaison officers in Greece.
September
’43:
April ’44:
July ’44:
Italian
effort
The Italian
Army’s Intelligence agency SIM (Servizio Informazioni Militari) had a cryptanalytic
department that successfully solved Yugoslav codes from the 1930’s up to
1941. During the occupation of Yugoslavia, the Slavic desk turned its attention
to the communications of partisan groups and by mid 1943 had solved two systems
used by the Chetniks and one used by Tito’s Partisans.
British
effort
The Brits
first established contact with resistance
movements in September 1941. During the period 1941-44 they monitored the internal
situation in Yugoslavia by decoding German military, police and Abwehr
messages. Messages between Tito and Moscow were read from 1943 onwards. From
the autumn of ’43 Internal traffic of the Chetniks and the Partisans was
monitored and decoded from a station in Bari, Italy.
The Enigma traffic in 1942 revealed that Mihailović had become a problem
for the German occupation authorities and there were plans to capture him. Intercepted
messages showed that the Chetniks were fighting against the Germans and had
captured the city of Foca (a town south-east of Sarajevo). This news
contradicted the version given by European papers (probably with Moscow’s
blessing) that attributed the victory to Tito’s partisans.
By 1943 the British were concerned by Mihailović’s decision to conserve
his forces for the period of liberation. The SOE organization was particularly
critical of the Chetniks and favored the Partisans. In the first half of the
year Enigma messages provided detailed coverage of the major anti-partisan
operations Weiss and Schwarz. All these operations were inconclusive as they
inflicted heavy losses on the resistance movements but failed to destroy them
or capture Mihailović and Tito. The Enigma traffic revealed that the fighting
ability of the Chetnik units was inferior to that of the Partisans and that
there was cooperation between Chetniks and Italians. However no indication of Chetnik
collaboration with the Germans was found. Another benefit of the decoded Enigma
messages was the discovery that the Germans were reading Chetnik and Partisan
traffic.
In the course of the year Enigma messages showed that German authorities
considered the Chetniks as a threat and wanted to arrest Mihailović however at
the same time there was evidence of cooperation between Chetnik groups and the
Germans against the Partisans. By the end of 1943 these reports led to a change
in British policy as Mihailović was considered to be holding back his units
while the Partisans were engaged in major operations. The Partisans had also
won battles against the Chetniks in the ongoing civil war. The British thus
increased supplies to the Partisans while Mihailović received virtually no
supplies after November 1943. In September 1943 the Italian surrender meant
that Italian divisions laid down their arms and many were disarmed by the Partisans.
This was a huge boost of their combat power as overnight they captured heavy
weapons and ammunition. Combined with the political decision to back Tito this
meant that the Partisans were now the rising force in Yugoslavia.
In 1944 decoded messages showed that Mihailović was hard pressed by the
Partisans and the loss of British support. As his forces failed to hold down
Axis units the Allied military missions attached to his forces were recalled by
May ’44. At the same time the Partisans increased their sabotage operations and
attacked garrisons of satellite troops. Major German operations in Zagreb,
Sarajevo area and Bosnia were again inconclusive as they inflicted heavy
casualties but did not destroy the Partisans or permanently remove them from
these areas. In the second half of ’44 the country fell into Tito’s hands as
the Germans evacuated Southeastern Europe.
Conclusion
The Axis
occupation of Yugoslavia unleashed the dormant nationalistic forces inside the
country and led to a civil war between different ethnic and political groups
such as the Croats, Serbs, Communists and Royalists.
The Germans
and Italians tried to destroy the Chetniks and the Partisans through military
force but they could not concentrate large enough forces to cover the whole
country. In their campaign against the resistance movements they had to rely on
signals intelligence. According to postwar interrogations the interception and
exploitation of Chetnik and Partisan communications produced good results.
From their
side the British also used signals intelligence to guide their policy versus Tito
and Mihailović. Initially they
followed the Yugoslav government in Exile in supporting Mihailović. However the information from German traffic showed that
Tito’s forces were defeating the Chetniks in the ongoing civil war and that they
were not holding back their forces but were attacking Axis units and destroying
rail lines. Since the British goal was
to divert as many German units as possible to Yugoslavia it makes sense that
they chose to back Tito in 1943.
This decision has been criticized postwar and several authors claim that
communist ‘fellow travelers’ or Soviet agents had a hand in the change of
policy. Although this might be true up to a point there is no doubt that
British policy was guided by the signals intelligence coming from German and
Yugoslav sources. The decoded messages showed that the Partisans were able to
fight and survive against German and Italian offensives and at the same time
defeat the Chetniks. In 1943-44 with operation ‘Overlord’ coming up the Allies
needed to draw as many German units as possible away from Western Europe. In
the eyes of the British leadership the Partisan movement in Yugoslavia could
achieve this goal. Of course this meant that postwar the country would fall to
the communists but it seems that was a price that Churchill was willing to pay.
Sources: TICOM reports I-51, I-115, I-205,
CSDIC/CMF/Y36 , CSDIC (U.K.) SIR 1704, ‘British intelligence in the Second
world war’ vol3 part1, ‘European Axis Signal Intelligence in World War II’
volumes 1,2 and 4, ‘The Secret Front: Nazi Political Espionage 1938-1945’, ‘The
history of Hut 6’ vol1, 'Action This Day: From the Breaking of the Enigma Code to the Birth of the Modern Computer’, Kriegstagebuch Inspectorate 7/VI, reports of KONA 4
for 1943-44.
Acknowledgements: I have to thank Ralph Erskine for information on the British exploitation of Partisan and Chetnik codes and Randy Rezabek for the reports of KONA 4.
Additional information: For more information on the use of signals intelligence by the Germans check the articles ‘The Key to the Balkans: The Battle for Serbia 1944’ and ‘The German ‘ultra’: signals intelligence in Yugoslavia 1943–1944’ by Gaj Trifković.
Acknowledgements: I have to thank Ralph Erskine for information on the British exploitation of Partisan and Chetnik codes and Randy Rezabek for the reports of KONA 4.
Additional information: For more information on the use of signals intelligence by the Germans check the articles ‘The Key to the Balkans: The Battle for Serbia 1944’ and ‘The German ‘ultra’: signals intelligence in Yugoslavia 1943–1944’ by Gaj Trifković.
No comments:
Post a Comment