The US
authorities used up to mid 1943 the Bell Labs A-3 speech scrambler, a device that
utilized band-splitting and inversion. The A-3 was not secure and in the period 1941-44 the
Germans were able to decode the conversations in real-time. American
cryptologists knew that the A-3 was insecure and they developed the SIGSALY,
a device that was a quantum leap in terms of security. However SIGSALY weighed over
50 tons and thus could only be used at prepared sites.
For field
communications a speech privacy system was urgently needed but at the time it
was not possible to combine a high level of crypto-security with a small and
compact design. According to the postwar
history of the US Army’s SSA-Signal Security Agency, in page 45, a portable
speech scrambler called AN/GSQ-1 - SIGJIP was developed by Bell Telephone
Laboratories in collaboration with the Signal Corps and in 1943 the
responsibility for its further development was transferred to the SSA. The
device was tested and its security was found wanting, however the need for such
a device was so great that in 1944 several units were sent to the European,
Mediterranean and South Pacific theaters.
According to TICOM reports the Germans were able to retrieve such a device from a downed Mustang fighter and although they solved the cryptologic system, in practice it was thought that finding the ‘key’ used for each mission would be difficult due to the time element.
From TICOM I-31 ‘Detailed interrogations of Dr. Hüttenhain, formerly head of research section of OKW/Chi, at Flensburg on 18-21 June 1945’
From TICOM I-58 ‘Interrogation of Dr. Otto Buggisch of OKW/Chi’
For those who
want more info on the AN/GSQ-1- SIGJIP in the US National Archives and Records Administration - RG 457 - Entry 9032 - box 792-
there is the file NR 2228 CBLL24 6144A 19450927 ‘PERFORMANCE SPEECH EQUIPMENT
AN/GSQ-1 AN/GSQ-1A SIGJIP-SIGMAR’.
Thanks for the excellent info. This type of voice encryption (taking small chunks of speech and rearranging them) is still used today for some less secure government/military systems. But to be able to do this in 1943 without digital electronics components was an amazing technical achievement.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the excellent site.