The
appearance of these vehicles forced the Germans to take emergency measures. The
immediate effort was concentrated in:
1). Introducing
a new A/T gun
2). Up
gunning and up armoring their Pz III, Pz IV and Stug vehicles
3). Using the
chassis of old vehicles (like the Pz II and Pz 38) coupled with captured Soviet
76mm A/T guns or the new Pak 40 as mobile tank destroyers.
The long term
solution was of course to design new tanks that could deal with the T-34 and
KV. These were the Tiger and Panther vehicles.
Let’s take a
look at the German effort:
1). The
Pak 97/38 A/T gun
The Germans
had captured a large number of French 75 mm ‘Model 1897’ guns and these were
used together with the carriage of the 50mm Pak 38. This was an interim
solution till the Pak 40 went into mass production. In 1942 2.854 Pak 97’s were
built and in 1943 858.
The Pak 40
– KwK 40 gun
The new gun
that could deal with the Soviet tanks was the 75mm Pak 40 L/46 and its
tank version KwK 40 in
the L/43 and L/48 models. The Pak 40/ KwK 40 had great penetration statistics
(armor penetrated at 30 degrees from vertical):
ammo
|
weight
|
Velocity (m/s)
|
500
|
1,000
|
1,500
|
2,000
|
|
KwK40 L/43
|
Pzgr 39
|
6.8
|
740
|
89
|
78
|
68
|
60
|
Pak 40 L/46
|
Pzgr 39
|
6.8
|
750
|
91
|
80
|
||
KwK40 L/48
|
Pzgr 39
|
6.8
|
770
|
96
|
84
|
74
|
65
|
The Pak 40 was built in large numbers in the period 1942-45 and the KwK version was installed in the Pz IV and Stug III:
1942
|
1943
|
1944
|
1945
|
Total
|
|
7.5cm Pak 40
|
2,114
|
8,740
|
11,728
|
721
|
23,303
|
The PzIV was
the main German tank in the period 1943-45. It weighed 25 tons and was equipped
with a 75m caliber gun. In 1941 it had a low velocity 75mm gun effective
against infantry but not armored targets and its armor was 30mm for front hull
and turret. In 1942 it received the KwK 40 L/43 and armor was upgraded to 50mm
for hull and turret (plus 30mm bolted on for the hull in some vehicles). In
1943 the hull armor was raised to 80mm and the Kwk 40 L/48 was installed. More than a third of the Pz IV’s in the East in the summer of 1942 had the Kwk 40 gun. However in the area of AGS the ratio was significantly higher as almost half had the new gun.
The Stug III was
used by infantry and tank destroyer units. In 1941 it had a low velocity 75mm
gun and frontal armor was 50mm. In 1942 it received the KwK40 and armor was
upgraded to 50mm plus 30mm bolted on plates. From 1943 the G version had 80mm
standard armor and all Stug’s had the kwk 40 L/48. Units in the East started
receiving Stug III’s with the KwK 40 gun in the first half of 1942.
1941
|
1942
|
1943
|
|
Pz III 50mm L/42
|
1,649
|
251
|
|
Pz III 50mm L/60
|
64
|
1,907
|
22
|
Pz III 75mm L/24
|
449
|
213
|
|
Pz IV 75mm L/24
|
480
|
117
|
|
Pz IV 75mm L/43
|
877
|
598
|
|
Pz IV 75mm L/48
|
2,425
|
||
Stug III 75mm L/24
|
540
|
93
|
|
Stug III 75mm L/43
|
330
|
||
Stug III 75mm L/48
|
365
|
3,011
|
3). Marder
series tank destroyers
The chassis
of the obsolete tanks Pz II and Pz 38 was used to mount captured Soviet 76mm
A/T guns and once it went into mass production the Pak 40:
1942
|
1943
|
Sum
|
||
Pz 38 76.2mm Pak
|
344
|
19
|
363
|
|
Pz 38 Pak 40 Marder III
|
110
|
799
|
909
|
|
Pz II Pak 40 Marder II
|
327
|
204
|
531
|
|
Pz II 76.2mm Pak
|
184
|
8
|
192
|
|
Sum
|
965
|
1,030
|
1,995
|
As we can see
the main German response was the introduction of the Pak 40/Kwk 40 and its
installation in the Pz IV, Stug and Marder vehicles. This gun gave the Germans
a big advantage in armored warfare as it could reliably penetrate the Soviet
vehicles at long ranges.
The Kwk 40
was as powerful as the US 76mm M1 tankgun (used on the improved M4 Sherman) and
the Soviet 85mm ZiS-S-53 (used on the T-34/85) but it was introduced 2 years
earlier!
The superior performance
of the German gun is confirmed by a Yugoslav
test which showed that the Pak 40 could penetrate the T-34/85 at the
following distances:
hull front
|
hull sides
|
turret front
|
turret sides
|
|
75mm Pak 40
|
1,300
|
1,750
|
1,000
|
1,750
|
76mm M1
|
1,100
|
1,500
|
900
|
1,500
|
85mm ZiS-S-53
|
1,200
|
1,750
|
1,000
|
1,500
|
The following
are excerpts from German combat reports found in ‘Panzertruppen’
volumes 1 and 2:
Report of
Panzer Regiment 33, dated 31 July 1942:
‘Penetration
ability of the long 75mm gun KWK 40 /L43 panzergranate 39 against the T-34: The
T-34 is cleanly penetrated at every angle that it is hit at ranges up to 1.200
meters’
‘T34: The T34 that was far superior to the
German Panzers up to the beginning of the Spring of 1942 is now inferior to the
German long 5 cm Kw.K. L/60 and 7.5 cm Kw.K.40 L/43 tank guns. After the
Russians attacked the German Panzer forces in several battles with the T34 and
received heavy losses, they didn't send the T34 tank against the German Panzers
so long as they had a chance to with-draw’
Report of 5th
Panzer Division for period 22 February to 20 March 1943:
‘7.5cm KwK 40 L/43 in 4 Pz IV: 17 KW-1, 26
T-34, 1 T-26, 1 Mark II, 3 Mark III, 1 General Lee. Pzgr.39 was fired at ranges
from 1.200 to 1.600 meters. Every hit caused a destructive effect with the tank
going up in flames. Two to three Pzgr.39 rounds were expended per tank killed.
Gr.38 HL/E1 ammunition was seldom used. One to five rounds were required to set
an enemy tank on fire.’
April 1943
report by Grossdeutschland division:
‘1. In the period from 7 March to 20 March
1943, 250 T34, 16 T60 or T70 and 3 KW-1 tanks were knocked out.
2. The number of kills scored by each
type of weapon were:
188 by Pz.Kpfw.IV 7.5 cm lang,
41 by Sturmgeschuetz 7.5 cm lang,
30 by Pz.Kpfw.VI (Tiger),
4 by 7.5 cm Pak (mot Zug),
4 by 7.5 cm Pak (Sfl),
1 by a direct hit from a s.I.G.
1 using a Hafthohlladung (hand-held shaped charge)’
1 using a Hafthohlladung (hand-held shaped charge)’
Sources: ‘Panzertruppen’, ‘Waffen und Geheimwaffen des deutschen Heeres
1933 – 1945’, ‘Panzerkampfwagen IV Ausf.G, H and J 1942-45’, ‘Encyclopedia Of
German Tanks Of World War Two’, ‘Kursk 1943: a statistical analysis’, tanknet
forum, ‘Armored Champion: The Top Tanks of World War
II’
Check this interesting report on the Tiger capabilities
ReplyDeletehttp://imgur.com/a/H1Anq#12
Antonio are you trying to make me mad? The report you linked to doesn’t even have one source for all the statements, that should give you a hint…
DeleteThe statements made are basically all wrong. Don’t make me write another WWII Myths piece…
The data is mostly correct. The Germans went with the 7,5 cm PzGr 39 armor piercing projectile in a big way.
ReplyDeleteLet's not trust too much of that report of Grossdeutschland. Where were numbers of tanks destroyed or let's say damaged by tank mines?
ReplyDelete