Mussolini’s
adventurism led to military reverses as the Italian economy was not mobilized
for war and the military did not have modern equipment and training. This forced
the Germans to come to their aid in the Balkans and in North Africa. However
that does not mean that the Italian military didn’t fight bravely. In the
Mediterranean it was the Italian navy that successfully
transported troops and supplies to the Axis forces led by Rommel. Italian
troops fought bravely in North Africa even though they were deficient in modern
weapons and lacked mobility. The Italians
may have lacked modern weapons however they did have a small but effective
cryptologic capability.
The Italian
Army and Navy had separate codebreaking agencies that managed to exploit
important foreign crypto-systems. The Army's
codebreakers could read the codes of several foreign countries, including the
communications of US military attaches and especially those of a mr Fellers in
Cairo. The Navy's
codebreakers were very successful with Royal Navy codes and cyphers. The Italian
codebreakers were assisted in their efforts by the good work of a special
undercover squad that entered foreign embassies and copied the codes.
Army agency
The Italian
army’s intelligence agency SIM (Servizio Informazioni Militari) had a
cryptanalytic department that attacked foreign crypto-systems. This section was
headed by General Vittorio Gamba and was located in Rome. Personnel strength
was roughly 50 people (half cryptanalysts-half linguists and clerks).
The
cryptanalytic department was divided into three sub-sections:
1).
Diplomatic
2). Military
and Research
3). Commercial
Personnel
were moved from section to section based on the current priorities. The
diplomatic section was subdivided into nine groups. The military
and research section had 5 cryptanalysts. The research section was responsible
for the initial ‘break’ into hard systems. Results were sent to field units. The
commercial section’s task was to check Italian commercial codes for
irregularities.
On average
8.000 messages were intercepted each month, 6.000 were studied and out of these
3.500 translated. The codes of several countries were read including France,
Turkey, Rumania, USA, Britain, Yugoslavia and the Vatican. According to
post-war reports there was a serious shortage of foreign speaking personnel and
a lack of funds. There was also lack of IBM equipment for statistical work. The Italians
used a small number of IBM punch card machines for cryptanalysis. Initially IBM
machines were used only at the offices of the Watson Corporation in Rome. However
it was only in the last stages of the war that these machines were used
regularly.
Intercept section
The intercept
section of SIM was the one that provided messages for cryptanalysis. It had 4
stationary intercept stations in Italy and 7 mobile units in Italy, the
colonies and the occupied territories.
There was poor
liaison between the intercept section and the cryptanalytic department and all
requests had to go through SIM headquarters.
The Sezione P unit
The Italians
were often able to read foreign codes without the use of cryptanalysis. Their
secret? They had a very efficient undercover team that entered foreign
embassies and copied codes and ciphers.
This was the
Extraction Section (Sezione Prelevamento), headed
by colonel Manfredi Talamo of the Carabinieri (military police). Its operatives
were experts in entering guarded areas and opening locks. It was this
unit that copied the Military Intelligence code No11 used by the US attaché in
Cairo colonel Bonner Fellers.
Cooperation with foreign countries
Cooperation
with Germany
General Gamba
arrived unannounced at OKW/Chi in 1938 and requested cooperation in the
cryptanalytic field. The Germans initially agreed to share results on French
diplomatic and military systems. This
collaboration was expanded and provided the Germans with important cryptologic
material like the US Military Intelligence code, however relations
between OKW/Chi and SIM were not as close as with the Finns and the Hungarians.
According to Fenner, head of the cryptanalysis department of OKW/Chi, the
Italians took too long to respond to requests or did not send the agreed upon
material. An even greater problem was their resistance regarding the change of
their weak cipher systems. As the war went on relations became strained since
the Germans came to distrust the Italians.
Cooperation
with the German army‘s signal intelligence agency - OKH/In 7/VI seems to have
been poor as the Germans had little respect for Italian cipher security.
Cooperation
with Hungary
According to ‘European
Axis Signal Intelligence in World War II’ vol8, there was cooperation between
the Hungarian
cryptologic service and the Italians.
In page 21 it
says:
Liaison with the Italians on
cryptanalytic matters appears to have been very good. The Hungarians maintained
liaison officers in Rome and made the results of their work available to the
Italians.
Cooperation
with Finland
Some
intercepted traffic was sent to the Finnish cryptologic service.
Notable successes
Fellers
code
In late 1941
the Sezione P unit managed to
infiltrate the US embassy in Rome and copied crypto material. One of the systems
copied was the Military Intelligence Code No11 used by military attaches. This
allowed the Italians to decode the messages of US attaches from embassies
around the world.
The most important transmissions were those of colonel Fellers
US ,attaché in Cairo. Fellers was a
graduate of West Point and former assistant of General Douglas MacArthur. He
was posted to Cairo in October 1940. His job was to provide Washington with
detailed information on all important military operations. The British gave
him access to their facilities and shared sensitive information on upcoming
operations. All this
information was extremely important for the Axis side. The Italians shared the Military Intelligence code
with the Germans.
According to
Fenner, head of the cryptanalysis department of OKW/Chi, the Italians sent him
a copy of the codebook in 1941 but not the encipherment tables. He got these
from the Hungarians. Both sides
were able to read the Fellers messages during the first half of 1942.
Yugoslav Army
code
In 1940 the
Italian forces in Albania invaded Greece. The Greek army was able to drive them
back and hard fighting ensued.
Practically
all the Italian forces were concentrated in the south of Albania. This meant
that the Albanian-Yugoslav border was not well protected. A sneak attack by
Yugoslav troops had the potential to destroy the Italian forces.
In April 1941
this operation was put in motion by the Yugoslav high command. The Italians
were in a tight spot however they were able to cope with the situation through
their mastery of Yugoslav codes.
The Italian
codebreakers sent two messages to the Yugoslav divisions, written in the correct
format and ‘signed’ by General Dusan Simovic, head of the new government. These
said:
1). To the Cetinje divisional headquarters:
Subordinate troops will suspend all
offensive action and retire in the direction of Podgorica, organizing for
defense.
2). To the Kosowska Mitrovica divisional
headquarters:
Withdraw immediately with all
subordinate troops back towards Kosowska Mitrovica.
Since the
messages were enciphered with the Yugoslav army code and had all the signs of a
real order they were accepted by the divisions and the offensive was halted! The Cetinje
division requested confirmation from HQ but none came and it too retreated.
When the next day HQ responded that no retreat had been authorized it was too
late. Italian military units had occupied the abandoned areas and the Yugoslavs
had bigger problems to handle as the German invasion had led to the collapse of
their military forces.
Naval agency
The naval
intelligence agency SIS (Servizio informazioni Speciali della Royal Marina) was
divided into 4 branches. Branch B (Beta) was tasked with signals intelligence.
It was subdivided into cryptanalysis, interception and direction finding,
security and clandestine radio intercepts.
The
cryptanalytic department was located in Rome and headed by Commander Mario De
Monte. In the 1930’s they solved several French naval systems. During the war the
emphasis was on British naval and naval aviation codes. Low level British naval
codes were easily solved. The Italians also read the Royal Navy’s Administrative
Code (used from 1934 till August 1940), the Naval Code No1 and No2 (used from
August ‘40 till March ’43) plus the Naval Cypher No1 and No2 (used from 1934
till January ‘42). They acquired Naval Cypher No3 (Anglo-American Cypher used
from June ’41 till June ‘43) from the Germans and were able to solve the
encipherment. For speeding up their work they used punch card equipment in 1942.
The Italian
Air Force Intelligence Service (Servizio Informazioni Aeronautica) relied on
the Navy department for interception and cryptanalysis. In 1941 the Airforce
set up its own intercept station and sent the messages to the Navy.
Intercept section
The interception
and direction finding department of Branch Beta supplied messages and had 7
main stations in Italy and its possessions. The intercept network was comprised
of the following stations:
- Monte
Rorondo, near Rome with subcentre at Licola.
- Tirrenia,
with substations at Arma di Taggia and Toulon.
- Porto Palo,
Augusta with substation at Favignana.
- Pula,
Sardinia with substation at Porto Torres.
- Rhodes,
Greece.
- Tripoli, Libya.
- Benghazi, Libya
Additional
material was received from the Germans. The daily average was 3,000 messages.
Special intercept units were also based onboard flagships (squadrons, divisions
and convoy escorts) so that the intercepted messages could be exploited as
quickly as possible and the information communicated to the naval commanders.
Cooperation
with the Germans
During the
1930’s liaison was established with the German Navy’s cryptanalytic service B-Dienst
and some information on French codes was exchanged. The Germans also gave
information on the British Administrative code but did not share their work on
other systems.
After Italy’s
entry into the war relations became much closer and information was exchanged
on the Naval Cypher and Naval Code. Finally in 1942 the Naval Cypher No3
(Convoy Cypher) was shared.
There was a
daily exchange of recovered code groups via teleprinter and every week a
written report was sent. Branch Beta also received messages from German
intercept units.
Battle of
the convoys
In the period
1940-1943 the naval codebreakers concentrated on the codes and ciphers of the
Royal Navy. The call signs, messages and volume of traffic of British units
were analyzed in order to build up the British order of battle and identify the
movement of units in the Mediterranean. Branch Beta summarized this information
in a daily bulletin submitted to all naval commands. The value of codebreaking and signals intelligence was recognized by the Navy’s high command and there was close cooperation between Branch Beta and the operational command of the Italian Navy. According to Admiral Franco Maugeri, head of the SIS:
‘The departure of an enemy naval
force or a convoy from East or West never escaped the SIS, and it was almost
always possible to establish within a few hours its composition and even its
objectives; which permitted immediate counter measures on the part of our naval
command, and the most Important naval encounters (Battle of Punta Stile, of
Cape Tulada, of Cape Matapan, the two actions off Sirte, and that of
Pantellaria) originated through information from the SIS’.
Another
advantage from reading British naval codes was gained by learning of their
plans to attack Italian convoys to N.Africa. Messages from British naval
aircraft (Fleet Air Arm) could be decoded very quickly and these gave an insight
into British operations, especially against Italian convoys. In those cases the
Italian command quickly warned the convoys by sending them top priority
messages called PAPA (Precedenza Assoluta sulla Precedenza Assoluta) so they
could alter their course. Work after the surrender of 1943
Mussolini was established as head of the Italian Social Republic covering the German occupied areas. This state continued to use a small number of SIM codebreakers. They mostly exploited systems already broken before the surrender. The main emphasis was on diplomatic messages in order to get information about conditions in the liberated areas.
The Germans
were not helpful and they did not exchange results with the codebreakers of the
Social Republic.
Conclusion
Italy entered
WWII hoping to exploit Germany’s victory for its own gains. When the war
dragged on the Italian economy and the military forces were unable to deal with
the new situation and the country tried to surrender to the Allies in 1943. Despite these
shortcomings Italian army units and the Navy fought well in the Mediterranean
and North Africa. In the cryptologic field the Italians were hampered by the lack of personnel and resources. Still they were able to exploit several important enemy systems and provided the Italian leadership with the confidential messages of several foreign countries. In the case of the Fellers messages and the Yugoslav Army code their efforts truly had a strategic effect. Their naval codebreakers successfully solved the codes of their main opponent, the Royal Navy, and took advantage of this in several naval engagements.
Considering
the resources at their disposal it would be hard to ask more of the Italian
codebreakers.
Sources:
HW 40/75 ‘Enemy exploitation of Foreign Office codes and cyphers: miscellaneous reports and correspondence’, TICOM DF-187D ‘Relations of OKW/Chi with foreign cryptologic bureaus’, ‘The codebreakers’, ‘European Axis Signal Intelligence in World War II vol8’, Cryptologia article: ‘The cryptographic services of the Royal British and Italian Navies’, International Journal of Intelligence and Counter-Intelligence article: ‘Left in the Dust: Italian Signals Intelligence, 1915-1943’, TICOM I-12 ‘Translation of the Preliminary Interrogation of O.R.R. Tranow of 4/SKL III/OKM, carried out at Flensburg on 24-25 May 1945 by TICOM Team 6’, Wikipedia, Naval War College Review article: ‘The Other Ultra: Signal Intelligence and the Battle to Supply Rommel's Attack toward Suez’,
‘Italian Communications Intelligence Organization’-Report by Admiral Maugeri with U.S. Navy Introduction, TICOM D-71 'German and Italian Correspondence on Miscellaneous Cyphers', CSDIC/CMF/Y 29 ‘First detailed interrogation of Samarughi, Giuseppe’, CSDIC/CMF/Y 4 ‘First detailed interrogation of Bigi, Augusto’, CSDIC (main)/ Y 12 ‘First detailed interrogation of Vassalio Todaro’
HW 40/75 ‘Enemy exploitation of Foreign Office codes and cyphers: miscellaneous reports and correspondence’, TICOM DF-187D ‘Relations of OKW/Chi with foreign cryptologic bureaus’, ‘The codebreakers’, ‘European Axis Signal Intelligence in World War II vol8’, Cryptologia article: ‘The cryptographic services of the Royal British and Italian Navies’, International Journal of Intelligence and Counter-Intelligence article: ‘Left in the Dust: Italian Signals Intelligence, 1915-1943’, TICOM I-12 ‘Translation of the Preliminary Interrogation of O.R.R. Tranow of 4/SKL III/OKM, carried out at Flensburg on 24-25 May 1945 by TICOM Team 6’, Wikipedia, Naval War College Review article: ‘The Other Ultra: Signal Intelligence and the Battle to Supply Rommel's Attack toward Suez’,
‘Italian Communications Intelligence Organization’-Report by Admiral Maugeri with U.S. Navy Introduction, TICOM D-71 'German and Italian Correspondence on Miscellaneous Cyphers', CSDIC/CMF/Y 29 ‘First detailed interrogation of Samarughi, Giuseppe’, CSDIC/CMF/Y 4 ‘First detailed interrogation of Bigi, Augusto’, CSDIC (main)/ Y 12 ‘First detailed interrogation of Vassalio Todaro’
Excellent post. Great information.
ReplyDeleteExcellent and very clear article. Did the Italians read and decode Tito partisan radio traffic from Yugoslavia during the war?
ReplyDeleteHave a look:
Deletehttp://chris-intel-corner.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-secret-messages-of-marshall-tito.html