Friday, November 4, 2011

Strength and loss data Eastern Front – part 1

I have the following table from Axis History forum user Qvist :


Quarter
German Istarke
Soviet Fronts
Ratio
1941
3q41
2,800,000
3,334,000
1.2
4q41
2,675,000
2,818,500
1.1
1942
1q42
2,525,000
4,186,000
1.7
2q42
2,600,000
5,060,300
1.9
3q42
2,825,000
5,664,600
2.0
4q42
2,900,000
6,343,600
2.2
1943
1q43
2,800,000
5,892,800
2.1
2q43
2,850,000
6,459,800
2.3
3q43
2,850,000
6,816,800
2.4
4q43
2,575,000
6,387,200
2.5
1944
1q44
2,406,750
6,268,600
2.6
2q44
2,409,750
6,447,000
2.7
3q44
2,076,250
6,714,300
3.2
4q44
1,900,800
6,770,100
3.6
1945
1q45
1,800,000
6,461,100
3.6
2q45
6,135,300



Explanation for Iststarke :Actual strength, includes all men that are part of the unit's composition. Men on leave or temporarily detached to other units are included. Also men sick or wounded are included if they are assumed to return to service within eight weeks. Thus, despite its name, this strength category does not give the actual number of men available for service with the unit at the given time.


The data for the Soviet Forces comes from Krivosheev, Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses in the Twentieth Century..



More data for German forces can be found in Kursk 1943: A Statistical Analysis ,by Zetterling and Frankson.Specifically pages 2 and 5:

On 1 July 1942 German forces in the East were 2.635.000 plus 150.000 in Finland and 212.000 in rear occupied areas of Eastern Europe.Total 2.997.000.

On 1 July 1943 German forces in the East were 3.138.000(Waffen SS and ground combat units of the Luftwaffe are included) plus 80.000 on Finnish front.Total 3.218.000.



The same authors in ‘’Analyzing World War II Eastern front battles’’ give for 1 June 1944 a German Istarke of 2.089.559 in the East. This figure does not include non-combat GHQ units and units directly under command of OKH (which were quite numerous).If those units are included the total is 2.557.000



At the start of Barbarossa the German had 2.5 mln troops in action and 500.000 as reinforcements .Also ~150.000 were based in the Far North theater .So total ~3.2mln.This is mentioned by many authors,including Ziemke.

What about casualties? Here is a table using Krivosheev for Soviet forces and Axis History Forum for German losses ( both sets of data refer only to only KIA,MIA,WIA ):

East Front Casualties
Losses By quarter
Quarter
German
Soviet
Ratio
1941
3q41
551,189
2,795,638
5.07
4q41
279,861
1,598,456
5.71
1942
1q42
280,238
1,686,355
6.02
2q42
220,291
1,395,335
6.33
3q42
383,750
2,371,162
6.18
4q42
177,050
1,281,085
7.24
1943
1q43
498,795
1,908,052
3.83
2q43
110,139
444,858
4.04
3q43
533,025
2,633,522
4.94
4q43
381,725
1,939,845
5.08
1944
1q44
423,715
1,859,810
4.39
2q44
352,831
1,021,576
2.90
3q44
879,127
1,771,879
2.02
4q44
297,782
1,086,807
3.65
































Author Zetterling in ‘’Normandy 1944’’ gives slightly higher losses for the Germans :



German Losses -Zetterling
1941
831,050
1942
1,080,950
1943
1,601,445
1944
1,947,106



Accurate data on German losses are not available for 1945.

In order to make this comparison complete we should include the strength and losses of the German allies.

From various sources I have the following strength data at the start of Barbarossa campaign (all approximate):

Rumanian 340.000 , Finnish 250.000 , Italian 60.000 , Hungarian 44.000 , Slovak 45.000 .

Sum : 739.000 .Not all participants joined combat at the start of the campaign though.


From ‘’Kursk 1943’’ : 1 July 1942 – German satellites 648.000 , Finnish forces 210.000

1 July 1943 -German satellites 225.000 , Finnish forces 230.000.

Finally regarding losses ,this thread in AHF has information .

Using various sources I made this table :


Axis Allies Casualties Eastern Front
KIA
MIA
WIA
Total
Rumania 1941-August 1944
71,000
163,000
243,000
477,000
Don Battles
155,000
Italy
30,000
54,000
34,000
118,000
Finland Continuation War
52,554
2,377
161,217
216,148
Hungary 41-5/45
120,000
200,000
320,000
Don Battles
8,718
79,870
16,497
105,085
Blue Division
3,938
300
8,466
12,704
Slovakia 41-March 44
1,235
2,537
3,198
6,970
Division Wallonien
2,500
2,500

























All this information is valuable for assessing the true nature of the war in the East.

2 comments:

  1. Do not you think that with such a loss ratio of the Red Army would never have gained the victory over Germany.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nope, since the SU could focus all its manpower against Germany while the opposite was not true. IF the Germans were able to transfer all their forces East then the exchange ratio might have changed the outcome of the war.

    ReplyDelete