Since the
1930’s a segment of German society that opposed the National-Socialist regime had
tried to establish contact with foreign countries in order to topple Hitler. During
the war the same groups contacted US and British officials in neutral countries
and tried to gain their support in order to remove the NS regime from power.
The Western Allies were aware of these efforts but they did not offer material
support to the members of the German
resistance.
At
the same time elements of the NS regime came to realize that the war was lost and
thus made cautious attempts to contact Allied officials that could promote some
sort of compromise peace. Heinrich Himmler was
leader of the SS security service and thus one of the most powerful men in Nazi
Germany. Yet by 1943 he was beginning to realize that hopes for a successful
conclusion of the war were slim. His subordinate General Walter Schellenberg,
head of the foreign intelligence department of the Sicherheitsdienst,
had many talks with Himmler on the need for a compromise peace and in 1943 he
was able to make the first attempts at contacting Allied officials.
The Germans knew that Allen Dulles was in charge of the OSS-Office of Strategic Services
station in Bern, Switzerland and they chose to contact him through people
associated with the German resistance.
In early 1943 Prince Max
Hohenlohe (working on behalf of the Sicherheitsdienst)
was given permission to travel to Switzerland and meet Dulles. Unfortunately it
doesn’t seem like their meeting remained a secret for long. In the Finnish
national archives one can find the decoded version of message No 2.181 of April
7, 1943, giving an overview of their discussion. Both the German resistance (through Admiral Canaris) and the Sicherheitsdienst (through Schellenberg) had warned Dulles that his communications were compromised but it doesn’t seem like he acted on this information. These efforts for a compromise peace were probably doomed from the start (especially since the Germans seemed to have overestimated the influence of Dulles) but even so without secure communications the talks could not have remained secret for long.
Just stumbled over your phenomenal site-- I imagine you were not a fan of The Imitation Game. :o)
ReplyDeleteTo go off topic a moment, your post on Himmlers' doomed attempts at a negotiated peace make me curious whether you've come across any signal traffic (whether on Allied or Axis side) giving credence to my new favorite conspiracy theory-- that the Valkyrie plotters actually succeeded in killing Hitler in July 1944 but senior Nazis decide to pretend he survived by subbing in one of his body doubles. Presumably then, the "Hitler" found dead outside the Berlin bunker was just such a luckless double. French writer Robert Christophe laid out the case for this in a 1983 book (which unfortunately was never published in English).
http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=4367
No, I’ve never seen any evidence to support that conspiracy theory. Moreover wouldn’t the other top Nazis object to an impostor running the Reich? What about the officers that took part in the daily briefings on the military situation? Wouldn’t they notice a change in the Fuehrer? Conspiracy theories are fun most of the time but come on…
DeleteThe impostor-- and Hitler surely had more than one double-- wouldn't actually run the country, he'd just be sent out as needed for public appearances (of which, post-Valkyrie, Hitler made very few). A voice impersonation for radio speeches or telephone calls would be even easier to pull off. The BBC apparently at times used a Churchill impersonator (actor Norman Shelley) to read WSC speeches. This was rumored for years but Shelley didn't come forward to admit it until the 1970s.
ReplyDeleteDuring the war, no German official or general would challenge such a deception for fear of getting the Rommel treatment for perceived disloyalty. After the war, these same German leaders were busy trying to look blameless to accusations of war crimes and putting all guilt on Hitler. That would be a harder argument to make if said war crimes continued on past Hitler's natural life.
I don't really think this theory is true but it is fun to think about it. Clearly the producers of that Tom Cruise movie missed a great opportunity to sidestep its biggest marketing defect-- that everyone already knew the ending. Maybe they should have had Oliver Stone direct it. :o)
http://youtu.be/zHgyUL3M4IY
Their interest in Prince Max Hohenlohe stemmed primarily from his peace efforts. He arranged a deal for peace wherein Hitler would step down from power and restore restricted democracy in exchange for a British alliance against the Soviets and the allowance of a land bridge between Germany and East Prussia.
ReplyDelete