From the information presented so far it is clear that
Turing was a fascinating individual and a movie about him was long overdue but
is ‘The imitation game’ up to the challenge?
What I expected to
see
Since I’ve read quite a lot on WWII cryptology and signals
intelligence there are some events that I expected to see in the movie, not
only because they would add realism to the film but also because they prove
that truth is stranger than fiction. What are they?
Polish
codebreakers: In the 1930’s
the British and French codebreakers, despite their best efforts, were unable to
solve the plugboard Enigma. If countries with great resources and a long tradition
in cryptanalysis could not solve this device one would expect that no one else
could have succeeded, especially a smaller country with limited resources. Yet contrary
to all expectations the Polish codebreakers had not only managed to figure out the
operating principle of the Enigma but had succeeded in retrieving the rotor
wrings and then solved the internal settings of several networks. They managed
to keep this a secret not only from the Germans but also from their close
allies! They only revealed their success to the French and British
representatives in July 1939 and thus helped them immensely in their
codebreaking work.
Gordon Welchman and the diagonal board: Welchman was a talented
mathematician who worked on the Enigma with success, eventually running Hut 6,
responsible for German Army and Airforce Enigma trafffic. Welchman’s great
contribution was coming up with the idea of the diagonal board. Turing’s bombes
were modified to add the diagonal board which made them much more efficient in
their operation. As Gordon puts it in ‘The Hut Six story’, p304: ‘Turing, though initially incredulous, was
quick to appreciate the importance of this new twist in Enigma theory, which
greatly reduced the number of bombe runs that would be needed to ensure success
in breaking an Enigma key by means of a crib’
Naval Enigma –
Lofoten raid: By 1940 the
British codebreakers were routinely solving current Enigma traffic, mainly from
Luftwaffe networks. Against the naval Enigma however they had made little
progress because the device was used in a more secure manner (additional rotors
and use of enciphered message indicators). By March ’41 their only operational
success had been the solution of the Enigma ‘key’ for 5 days of 1938 and 6 days
in April 1940. In order to force this deadlock the Brits decided to put
statistics on the side and use brute force instead! In March 1941 a commando
raid was mounted against the German forces in the Norwegian Lofoten islands with the goal of capturing Enigma cipher material (monthly keylists and
indicator tables). This operation was a success with material retrieved from the
German armed trawler Krebs. This material allowed Hut 8 to decrypt the
February traffic during March. Then thanks to the intelligence gained from this
‘break’ they were able to solve the April and May traffic cryptanalytically.
4-rotor naval Enigma/4-rotor US bombe: In
February 1942 the U-boat command stopped using the 3-rotor Enigma and instead
introduced a modified 4-rotor version. This was much more secure than the 3-rotor
version and immediately put an end to the British success. British and American
efforts to solve it failed again and again. By December 1942 only 3 days
traffic had been broken. This failure had strained relations between British
codebreakers and the US navy’s OP-20-G. It was obvious that new 4-rotor
‘bombes’ were needed but the British reassurance that these would be soon
introduced failed to materialize. The Americans then decided to build their own
‘bombes’ at the National Cash Register Corporation under engineer Joseph Desch. It was a
good thing they did because the British 4-rotor ‘bombe’ design turned out to be
problematic.
Are these events
mentioned in the actual movie? Let’s see.
‘The imitation
game’
The movie starts with the police investigation in 1952 and
then takes us back to 1939 when Turing first visited GCCS. There he had to solve
the Enigma while facing the hostility of Commander Denniston and the other
cryptanalysts. Everyone thinks that Turing is a failure but eventually his
‘wacky’ idea to build a machine in order to decode a machine finally works and
immediately the British know of the location of every German U-boat in the
Atlantic. However they decide not to sink them all because that would alert the
Germans. In fact Turing stops them from notifying an Allied convoy of an
impending attack even though the brother of one of his fellow cryptanalysts is
on board. Turing with the help of Stewart Menzies keeps
his success with the Enigma a secret from the military authorities and also
from Commander Denniston because he fears that they will misuse it. Instead he
decides to use statistical theory in order to find where the Enigma
intelligence should be used to have the best effect on the war effort. Having
won the war on his own Turing then goes back to teaching and the movie shows
how much he suffered from the police investigation and the hormonal therapy,
leading to his accident/suicide.
Yeah….
The movie is definitely entertaining with great actors,
great sets, great cinematography etc. However the storyline isn’t just
exaggerated in parts or simplified for the general audience. We’re talking
about huge errors and strange conspiracy theories being shown to viewers who
probably don’t know any better.
Am I exaggerating? Someone can counter that it’s not a
documentary, it’s a movie. Let’s have look at the failures of the film in more
detail. Grab a beer, coffee, tea, whatever works for you because you’ll need it…Turing definitely wasn’t an average person and obviously had his idiosyncrasies, however the film makes him look completely helpless in his interactions with other people. Maybe the producers thought that the average viewer would only appreciate how smart Turing was by making him autistic.
Bletchley Park = Four guys and a pub
I thought that Bletchley Park was a huge organization with
thousands of people working on Axis codes. Apparently I was wrong. According to
the movie Bletchley Park consisted of four cryptanalysts (Turing included) and
a rather homely pub. Oh, there’s also a storehouse where they keep the bombe
ehh i mean ‘Christopher’. Some books claim that the bombe was built by Harold Keen, the chief engineer of the British Tabulating Machine Company based on Turing’s designs. These books are wrong (according to the movie). The bombe was built by Turing himself with no assistance from anyone else.
Where are the Poles?
I’ve said earlier that the first to succeed with the
military Enigma were the Polish
codebreakers. For some reason the movie doesn’t acknowledge their success.
When at the beginning of the movie Turing meets Commander Denniston he is told
that everyone considers the Enigma unbreakable. This is after September 1939
because in the first scenes we hear the declaration of war between Germany and
UK. Yet in July 1939 the Polish had
revealed their success to the Brits and French.
Later in the movie
when MacGyver Turing is building his bombe he says that his machine was
inspired by an old Polish machine but is infinitely more advanced. This is not
explained further nor is any reference made to the Polish solution. In fact the
Turing bombe was not necessarily infinitely
more advanced from the Polish device, it basically worked on a different
principle.
Where’s Gordon?
Apparently Gordon Welchman never existed. However the diagonal
board is mentioned once without explaining how it works. In the movie it is
discovered by Hugh
Alexander.
Turing industries: Build first - figure out how it works
later
In real life Turing came up with the idea of exploiting a
‘crib’ (suspected plaintext in the ciphertext) in the Enigma traffic and built
a device around that idea. In the movie Turing starts building the bombe as
soon as he arrives at Bletchley Park. Yet he only figures out cribbing much
later thanks to Joan Clarke!!!
What was he building all that time?
Where are the Americans?
The movie doesn’t make any reference to the new 4-rotor
Enigma introduced in 1942 in the U-boat command. No mention is made of the
technologically advanced US 4-rotor bombes.
The Enigma panopticon
According to the movie once they finally solved the settings
for a day they easily found the locations of all the enemy submarines in the
Atlantic. No mention is made of difficulties in interpreting messages, delays
in decoding, lack of traffic or failure to decode. Yet decoding naval messages
didn’t mean that someone could get their coordinates since they were enciphered
with a manual system before being enciphered once more on the Enigma. As
I’ve written in B-Dienst
vs Bletchley Park - The invasion of Norway and the Battle of the Atlantic ‘Coordinates were taken from a grid table.
From June ’41 coordinates were further disguised by using fixed reference
points on the grid table. From November ’41 an Adressbuch was used to encipher
the grid references’. The coordinates problem was only mastered by the
Allies in June 1944 when they captured an Adressbuch from U-boat U-505.
Conspiracy theories
The biggest problem I have with the movie is that it repeats
some strange theories that probably belong in a conspiracy forum rather than a
serious film.
The first one is that the Allies only used Ultra
intelligence when their statistical
theory??? showed that it would have a big impact on the war situation. In
the film they show a whole convoy being abandoned to the U-boats because had
they changed its course the Germans would have found out about Bletchley Park.
In real life Ultra intelligence was used on ALL fronts. Every measure was taken
to ensure secrecy and only the top commanders were fully indoctrinated into the
secret but the intelligence WAS used. For example what did the Brits do when (thanks
to captured keylists) in summer 1941 they started solving U-boats messages with
little time lag? They rerouted all
their convoys around U-boat concentrations. Only 5 of 26 SC convoys, 2 of 31 HX
convoys and 3 of 49 ON convoys were attacked…
The other weird theory promoted by the movie is that the
Soviet spy John Cairncross was known all along to the British security
services. In fact Menzies tells Turing that it was him that allowed Cairncross to
come to Bletchley Park so that he could send valuable intelligence to their
ally Stalin. I guess no one can touch those British superspies. They can never
lose. Even if you manage to get a spy into their organizations it’s only
because they know about it and they allow it….
More mistakes
From the first scenes it’s clear that Commander Denniston
doesn’t like Turing. He really, really
doesn’t like him. Perhaps Turing fought for the Starks…
When the Enigma device is first shown Denniston says that
Polish intelligence smuggled one out of Berlin. Nope. The first Enigma was
captured in February 1940 from U-boat U-33.
The movie shows Enigma being used by U-boats, which is
correct but it also shows Luftwaffe bombers sending messages which is not
correct. Aircraft used hand ciphers for sending messages.
A U-boat is shown attacking warships while underwater. Not
accurate. U-boats usually approached on the surface and their main goal was to
sink merchant ships not warships.
The movie says in the beginning that thanks to the U-boats
Britain was starving. Bullshit.
When Turing decides not to use the Enigma intelligence in
fear of alerting the Germans Keira Knightley says: ‘they’ll have changed the design of Enigma by the weekend’. In fact
the Germans were planning to replace the Enigma with a new device during the
war but they never managed it due to production problems.
Thanks for the interesting & detailed review, Christos.
ReplyDelete1. It's standard garbage, trying to create "drama" regarding maths. The moral dilemma about saving the convoy is absurd, he wouldn't know where his brother is, wartime secrecy.
ReplyDelete2. I do not mind the historical inaccuracies (maybe I watch too many fifties movies), but it is internally inconsistent. If you're going to tell a story, tell it well. In the beginning, they are already aware of known plaintext attacks on Engima, and use it to break some messages. They build a machine, but it in no sense is aware of what it's looking for. Then they realize that they could search for the key of a single message.
3. "Bletchley Park = Four guys and a pub" Erm. I accept that most movies don't quite have the budget to have a real cast of characters.
4. Replacing Engima? Any information on this replacement machine?
They had two systems in development. Cipher device 39 - SG 39 which was similar to the Enigma (had 4 rotors) but with 3 additional ‘Hagelin type’ rotors to make wheel movement irregular plus rewirable entry rotor and reflector. The other was a small device with sliding alphabets and ‘Hagelin type’ wheels called Cipher box - Schlüsselkasten. It was supposed to replace Enigma.
Delete