In January
2016 I wrote a summary of the progress I had made in researching some very
interesting cases of cryptologic history.
What is the
state of these cases a year later? Let’s see.
1). US
State Department M-138-A strip cipher
In
2016 I wrote:
This case has been (by
far) the most difficult of those I’ve had to research. Despite this I was able
to make real progress in 2015. I located the report ‘JAT write up - selections from JMA traffic' and used it to write
an essay on the material
transmitted from Germany and Finland to Japan, I received the
report I-89 ‘Report by Prof
Dr. H Rohrbach of Pers Z S on American strip cipher’ and wrote Compromise of
the State Department’s M-138-A strip cipher and the traffic of other US agencies.
Also during the year I
managed to find a lot of material on the Finnish codebreakers and their work on
the M-138-A strip cipher. Regarding the Carlson-Goldsberry
report the NSA’s FOIA
office has managed to locate it but releasing it will take time.
In 2016 I was
able to find more information on how the M-138-A cipher system was used by the
State Department and I presented this information in New
developments in the strip cipher case. I also added dr Huttenhain’s statements
on the solution of the M-138-A cipher, from his unpublished manuscript ‘Einzeldarstellungen aus dem Gebiet der
Kryptologie’.
Unfortunately
the TICOM report DF-15 ‘Reports of group
A’, that I expected would have details on the solution of the M-138-A cipher
by the codebreakers of the German Foreign Ministry, simply says in page 5:
SV: In the summer of 1941 A-Group
received through OKW a photographic copy of the Instructions for Use and 4
series of strips by means of which a number of messages could be deciphered.
SV means
Streifenverfahren = strip cipher system.
Regarding the
Carlson-Goldsberry report the NSA’s FOIA office still hasn’t
declassified it.
2). NKVD
5th Department codebreakers
As far as I
know no new information is available on the wartime operations and successes of
the Soviet codebreakers.
3). Referat
Vauck success
In
2016 I wrote:
After locating the reports of Referat
12 i was able to write the detailed essay Allied agents codes and Referat 12. I’ve also requested the postwar
interrogation reports of Dr Wilhelm Vauck from the NSA. However locating and
declassifying them will take some time.
The NSA’s
FOIA office has stated this year that ‘a thorough search of our historical
files was conducted but no records responsive to your request were located’.
Thus it seems
that dr Vauck was not interrogated by the Anglo-Americans at the end of WWII.
4). Forschungsamt
information
According to
the NSA’s FOIA office my case concerning the release of reports DF-240 and
DF-241 is in the final review queue.
5). German
Enigma investigations
In
2016 I wrote:
The reports of the German Army’s
codebreakers on the Enigma are available from government archives in the US and
Germany. Unfortunately no one has read and commented on them.
The
Inspectorate 7/VI reports are in the US National Archives and Records
Administration, collection RG 457 - entry 9032 - boxes 1405-1409. I don’t have
the means to check these boxes for the Enigma reports (plus they’re in German).
However I do
have the Inspectorate 7/VI war diary and I’ve copied the passages dealing with
research on the security of the Enigma cipher machine. As soon as I get some
accurate translations I’ll post the text.
6). Japanese
Purple and Coral cipher machines
I haven’t
seen any new information on the possible solution of these cipher machines by
the German codebreakers.
7). Soviet
diplomatic code
I haven’t
seen anything new on the possible solution of the Soviet diplomatic code by the
Germans.
8). M-209
decoding device
My previous
statement still stands:
‘I have to say I’m still surprised
that this
device has not received any attention from historians and/or
the media!’
Dear Christos: I am researching on Referat Vauck In 7 VI Matthäiplatz and there seems to have been there an excellent cryptograph named ,,Unteroffizier BERNHARD" in Referat Vauck Funkabwehr. Do you have any biographical information on this Unteroffizier Bernhard in the diary?
ReplyDelete